Start with a defined trigger
A design-system owner requests documentation for an approved component or revision.
Component change-to-guidance draft
This is a proposed workflow pattern. We confirm data access, permissions, integration options and review ownership with your team before implementation.
Do not claim accessibility conformance without appropriate verification. Examples must reflect supported behavior.
A design-system owner requests documentation for an approved component or revision.
Collect the component specification, implemented behavior, accessibility requirements and approved examples.
Draft usage guidance, constraints and examples, marking differences between design intent and implementation.
Design and engineering owners verify accuracy and accessibility claims before publishing.
Publish the accepted guidance with the component version and link unresolved implementation gaps.
Measure unsupported examples, recurring usage questions, inconsistencies and review corrections.
Keep the input, relevant context, review decision and final result connected. When a reviewer corrects something, use that evidence to improve the instructions or integration, then validate the change against representative cases.
The workflow stays centered on your business. The engagement determines who learns, implements and operates it.
Learn through courses, practical training and workshops. Get feedback as you apply the lessons to your own project.
Explore courses and workshops ↗Get everything in DIY, three months of workshops, weekly team sessions and direct implementation coaching.
Explore guided implementation ↗Include all the learning and guidance, with ownership of agreed operations and major implementation decisions.
Explore managed delivery ↗Looking for a course, help with a difficult problem, or someone to build a solution? Tell us where you are and what you'd like to do next.